Datenquellen:
PubChem, NIST Chemistry WebBook, CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (103rd ed.)
Zuletzt aktualisiert: 2026-06-25
Regulatorischer Status der Substanz
Keine Einträge für diese CAS-Nummer in den geprüften Beschränkungslisten (SVHC-Kandidatenliste, REACH Anhang XVII; Datensätze unvollständig – dies ist keine Konformitätsbestätigung). CLP-Einstufung und Transportstatus (ADR): siehe Abschnitt GHS und Sicherheitsdatenblatt (SDS).
Spektren werden bei Bedarf aus 9 Quellen abgerufen. Jedes Spektrum wird in unserer Datenbank gespeichert — beim nächsten Öffnen erfolgt keine Anfrage an die externe API. Laden Sie JCAMP-DX / CSV / PNG zu jedem Spektrum herunter, ohne zu suchen.
Daten werden über MolGod_Spectra_Remote_Fetcher (JCAMP-DX-Parser) abgerufen und in der Tabelle wp_molgod_spectra_cache gespeichert. Keine doppelten Downloads, keine erneuten Anfragen an NIST bei späteren Aufrufen. Lizenzen werden eingehalten (veröffentlicht wird nur ein Deep-Link plus eigene Visualisierung).
Daten werden live aus mehreren Quellen abgerufen (Priority-Chain). JCAMP-DX / CSV / PNG stehen unter jedem Spektrum zum Download bereit.
IR — Fourier-Transform-Infrarot
IR — Fourier-Transform-Infrarot wird geladen…
MS — Massenspektrometrie (EI 70eV)
MS — Massenspektrometrie (EI 70eV) wird geladen…
MolGod_MS_SP7
🔎 Spektrensuche (JCAMP-DX)
Laden Sie eine JCAMP-DX-Datei (.jdx, .dx, .jcm) hoch — das System berechnet die Cosine-Ähnlichkeit zu allen Spektren in der Datenbank und zeigt die TOP 10 Treffer an.
📚 Bibliografie (Chicago)
McLafferty, Fred W., ed. 2018. Wiley Registry of Mass Spectral Data. 11th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Eine MS-Referenzbibliothek (~775k Spektren).
Stein, Stephen E., and Donald R. Scott. 1994. "Optimization and Testing of Mass Spectral Library Search Algorithms for Compound Identification." Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry 5 (9): 859–866. Der Cosine- und Dot-Product-Algorithmus von NIST MS Search.
McDonald, Robert S., and Paul A. Wilks Jr. 1988. "JCAMP-DX: A Standard Form for Exchange of Infrared Spectra in Computer Readable Form." Applied Spectroscopy 42 (1): 151–162. Die JCAMP-DX-Spezifikation (erweitert auf 5.01 für NMR/MS).
McLafferty, Fred W., and František Tureček. 1993. "Interpretation of Mass Spectra." 4th ed. Mill Valley, CA: University Science Books. Cosine-Similarity-Matching und MS-Fragmentierung — die Grundlage des Suchalgorithmus.
Sumner, Lloyd W., Alexander Amberg, Dave Barrett, Michael H. Beale, Richard Beger, Clare A. Daykin, Teresa W.-M. Fan, et al. 2007. "Proposed Minimum Reporting Standards for Chemical Analysis." Metabolomics 3 (3): 211–221. MSI Level 1-4 — Standards für die Konfidenzstufe des spektralen Matchings.
Stein, Stephen E. 1999. "An Integrated Method for Spectrum Extraction and Compound Identification from Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry Data." Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry 10 (8): 770–781. Der AMDIS-Algorithmus — Dekonvolution + Library-Match (NIST).
Lindon, John C., George E. Tranter, and David W. Koppenaal, eds. 2017. "Encyclopedia of Spectroscopy and Spectrometry." 3rd ed. Amsterdam: Academic Press. Enzyklopädische Einträge zum Thema Spectral Library Searching.
Smith, Brian C. 2011. "Fundamentals of Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy." 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. FT-IR und das JCAMP-DX-Format für Transmissionsspektren.
Larkin, Peter. 2017. "Infrared and Raman Spectroscopy: Principles and Spectral Interpretation." 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Grundlagen des IR/Raman-Library-Matchings und der Peak-Vorverarbeitung.
📐Physikalische & chemische Eigenschaften (DB)
7 Felder MolGod-Score: Keine Quelle
Haynes, William M., ed. 2024. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 105th ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-1-032-55554-4. ↗
National Institute of Standards and Technology. 2024. "NIST Chemistry WebBook, SRD 69." Gaithersburg, MD: NIST. Accessed 2025-01-01. ↗
Yaws, Carl L. 2014. The Yaws Handbook of Physical Properties for Hydrocarbons and Chemicals. 2nd ed. Oxford: Gulf Professional Publishing.
PubChem. 2024. "PubChem Compound Database." National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health. Accessed 2025-01-01. ↗
Marrero, J., and R. Gani. 2001. "Group-Contribution Based Estimation of Pure Component Properties." Fluid Phase Equilibria 183–184: 183–208. ↗
Joback, K. G., and R. C. Reid. 1987. "Estimation of Pure-Component Properties from Group-Contributions." Chemical Engineering Communications 57 (1–6): 233–243. ↗
Sangster, J. 1997. Octanol-Water Partition Coefficients: Fundamentals and Physical Chemistry. Chichester: Wiley. ISBN 978-0-471-97397-3.
Mannhold, Raimund, and Han van de Waterbeemd. 2001. "Substructure and Whole Molecule Approaches for Calculating Log P." Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design 15 (4): 337–354. ↗
Perrin, Ditlev D., Boyd Dempsey, and E. P. Serjeant. 1981. pKa Prediction for Organic Acids and Bases. London: Chapman and Hall. ISBN 0-412-21090-5.
Constantinou, Leonidas, and Rafiqul Gani. 1994. "New Group Contribution Method for Estimating Properties of Pure Compounds." AIChE Journal 40 (10): 1697–1710. ↗
Ertl, Peter, Bernhard Rohde, and Paul Selzer. 2000. "Fast Calculation of Molecular Polar Surface Area as a Sum of Fragment-Based Contributions and Its Application to the Prediction of Drug Transport Properties." Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 43 (20): 3714–3717. ↗
🔄 Umrechner für Konzentrationseinheiten LIVEMolGod_UNITCONV_1
/* translators: %s, %d itd. to wartosci dynamiczne wstawiane do komunikatu. */
Geben Sie die Konzentration 5-hydroxytryptophan in einer beliebigen Einheit ein — der Rest wird automatisch berechnet.
Cohen ER, Cvitaš T, Frey JG, Holmström B, Kuchitsu K, Marquardt R, Mills I, Pavese F, Quack M, Stohner J, Strauss HL, Takami M, Thor AJ (2007)
g/L ↔ molarity
c (mol/L) = (g/L) / MW
±0.1% (depends on MW precision)
Cohen ER, Cvitaš T, Frey JG, Holmström B, Kuchitsu K, Marquardt R, Mills I, Pavese F, Quack M, Stohner J, Strauss HL, Takami M, Thor AJ (2007)
mmol/L ↔ molarity
c (mol/L) = mmol/L × 10⁻³
Exact
Cohen ER, Cvitaš T, Frey JG, Holmström B, Kuchitsu K, Marquardt R, Mills I, Pavese F, Quack M, Stohner J, Strauss HL, Takami M, Thor AJ (2007)
Celsius ↔ Kelvin
T(K) = t(°C) + 273.15
±0.01 K (ITS-90 scale)
BIPM (Bureau International des Poids et Mesures) (2019)
Celsius ↔ Fahrenheit
T(°F) = T(°C) × 9/5 + 32
±0.1 °F
Thompson A, Taylor BN (2008)
density-corrected % ↔ molarity
c (mol/L) = (%w/w × ρ × 10) / MW, ρ in g/mL
±0.1% when ρ known to 3 decimals
Cohen ER, Cvitaš T, Frey JG, Holmström B, Kuchitsu K, Marquardt R, Mills I, Pavese F, Quack M, Stohner J, Strauss HL, Takami M, Thor AJ (2007)
📚 Bibliographie (8 autoritative Quellen)
Thompson A, Taylor BN (2008). Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI). NIST Special Publication 811 · DOI: 10.6028/NIST.SP.811-2008 → Primary SI standard for US scientific usage
Cohen ER, Cvitaš T, Frey JG, Holmström B, Kuchitsu K, Marquardt R, Mills I, Pavese F, Quack M, Stohner J, Strauss HL, Takami M, Thor AJ (2007). Quantities, Units and Symbols in Physical Chemistry — The IUPAC Green Book. RSC Publishing, 3rd ed. · DOI: 10.1039/9781847557889 · ISBN: 978-0-85404-433-7 → Canonical IUPAC guide for chemistry quantities/units
BIPM (Bureau International des Poids et Mesures) (2019). The International System of Units (SI), 9th edition. BIPM · ↗ → International SI definitions (incl. redefined kilogram 2019)
ISO/IEC (2022). Quantities and units — Part 1: General. International Organization for Standardization — ISO 80000-1:2022 · ↗ → General rules for physical quantities and units
ISO/IEC (2019). Quantities and units — Part 9: Physical chemistry and molecular physics. International Organization for Standardization — ISO 80000-9:2019 · ↗ → Concentration / molality / amount-of-substance conventions
Tiesinga E, Mohr PJ, Newell DB, Taylor BN (2021). CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2018. Rev. Mod. Phys. 93(2):025010 · DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.93.025010 → Avogadro, gas constant, molar volume (2019 SI revision)
IUPAC (2019). Compendium of Chemical Terminology — the IUPAC Gold Book (online). IUPAC · DOI: 10.1351/goldbook → Definitions of mass fraction, molality, normality, ppm, activity
Mills IM, Cvitaš T, Homann K, Kallay N, Kuchitsu K (1988). Quantities, Units and Symbols in Physical Chemistry. Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1st ed. · ISBN: 0-632-01773-5 → Historical predecessor of IUPAC Green Book
🧪 Assistent zur Lösungsvorbereitung WIZARDMolGod_PREP_1
Rumble, John R., ed. 2023. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 104th ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. [link ↗]
International Association for the Properties of Water and Steam (IAPWS). 1997. "Release on the Static Dielectric Constant of Ordinary Water Substance." IAPWS R8-97. [link ↗]
Reichardt, Christian, and Thomas Welton. 2011. Solvents and Solvent Effects in Organic Chemistry. 4th ed. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527632220. [link ↗]
Hansen, Charles M. 2007. Hansen Solubility Parameters: A User's Handbook. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420006834. [link ↗]
IFA. n.d. "Water." GESTIS Substance Database. Institut für Arbeitsschutz der Deutschen Gesetzlichen Unfallversicherung. Accessed April 25, 2026. [link ↗]
Rumble, John R., ed. 2023. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 104th ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. [link ↗]
Reichardt, Christian, and Thomas Welton. 2011. Solvents and Solvent Effects in Organic Chemistry. 4th ed. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527632220. [link ↗]
Snyder, Lloyd R., Joseph J. Kirkland, and John W. Dolan. 2010. Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470508183. [link ↗]
Smallwood, Ian M. 1996. Handbook of Organic Solvent Properties. London: Arnold. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-340-64578-9.X5000-9. [link ↗]
Reichardt, Christian, and Thomas Welton. 2011. Solvents and Solvent Effects in Organic Chemistry. 4th ed. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527632220. [link ↗]
Hansen, Charles M. 2007. Hansen Solubility Parameters: A User's Handbook. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. [link ↗]
Rumble, John R., ed. 2023. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 104th ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. [link ↗]
Smallwood, Ian M. 1996. Handbook of Organic Solvent Properties. London: Arnold. [link ↗]
National Institute of Standards and Technology. n.d. "Methane, dichloro- (CAS 75-09-2)." NIST Chemistry WebBook, SRD 69. Accessed April 25, 2026. [link ↗]
Hansen, Charles M. 2007. Hansen Solubility Parameters: A User's Handbook. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. [link ↗]
International Agency for Research on Cancer. 1999. "Dichloromethane." IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans 71: 251–315. [link ↗]
Reichardt, Christian, and Thomas Welton. 2011. Solvents and Solvent Effects in Organic Chemistry. 4th ed. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH. [link ↗]
Armarego, Wilfred L. F., and Christina Li Lin Chai. 2009. Purification of Laboratory Chemicals. 6th ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-85617-567-8.50003-3. [link ↗]
Hansen, Charles M. 2007. Hansen Solubility Parameters: A User's Handbook. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. [link ↗]
National Institute of Standards and Technology. n.d. "Furan, tetrahydro- (CAS 109-99-9)." NIST Chemistry WebBook. Accessed April 25, 2026. [link ↗]
Smallwood, Ian M. 1996. Handbook of Organic Solvent Properties. London: Arnold. [link ↗]
National Institute of Standards and Technology. n.d. "Hexane (CAS 110-54-3)." NIST Chemistry WebBook. Accessed April 25, 2026. [link ↗]
Hansen, Charles M. 2007. Hansen Solubility Parameters: A User's Handbook. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. [link ↗]
Snyder, Lloyd R., Joseph J. Kirkland, and John W. Dolan. 2010. Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. [link ↗]
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. 1999. Toxicological Profile for n-Hexane. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. [link ↗]
International Agency for Research on Cancer. 1999. "Chloroform." IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans 73: 131–182. [link ↗]
National Institute of Standards and Technology. n.d. "Methane, trichloro- (CAS 67-66-3)." NIST Chemistry WebBook. Accessed April 25, 2026. [link ↗]
Hansen, Charles M. 2007. Hansen Solubility Parameters: A User's Handbook. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. [link ↗]
Reichardt, Christian, and Thomas Welton. 2011. Solvents and Solvent Effects in Organic Chemistry. 4th ed. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH. [link ↗]
Löslichkeitstheorie (angewandt bei der Kompatibilitätsvorhersage):
Yalkowsky, Samuel H., and Shri C. Valvani. 1980. "Solubility and Partitioning I: Solubility of Nonelectrolytes in Water." Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 69 (8): 912–922. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.2600690814 — General Solubility Equation (GSE): logS = 0.5 − logP − 0.01(MP−25).
Hansen, Charles M. 2007. Hansen Solubility Parameters: A User's Handbook. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420006834 — HSP triplet (dD, dP, dH) + wzór Ra.
Reichardt, Christian, and Thomas Welton. 2011. Solvents and Solvent Effects in Organic Chemistry. 4th ed. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527632220 — E_T(30) polarity scale, solwatochromia.
Snyder, Lloyd R., Joseph J. Kirkland, and John W. Dolan. 2010. Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470508183 — Eluotropic series, polarity index.
PubChem Compound Database — CAS 56-69-9 lookup ↗ — logP (XLogP3), water solubility experimental + predicted.
Vollständige Bibliografie im Akkordeon REFERENZEN (am Ende der Seite) — Chicago Manual of Style 17th ed., Author-Date.
🛡️ Sicherheit — CAS 56-69-9MolGod_SAFEHUB_MAIN
Hinweis zu Datenbeschränkungen. Die Sicherheitsinformationen auf dieser Seite dienen nur zur Information und ersetzen kein vollständiges Sicherheitsdatenblatt (SDS). Konsultieren Sie vor der Verwendung des Produkts das aktuelle Sicherheitsdatenblatt des Herstellers sowie die GHS/CLP-Leitlinien. Die CLP-Einstufung bezieht sich auf die reine Bulk-Substanz, nicht auf handelsübliche Zubereitungen.
MolGod_GHS_SF1
GHS/CLP-Einstufung — Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1272/2008 + UN GHS Rev. 9 (2021).
P210 — Von Hitze, heißen Oberflächen, Funken, offenen Flammen und anderen Zündquellenarten fernhalten. Nicht rauchen.
⚠ Einstufung basierend auf einem Konsens der Quellen (PubChem / Meldungen der Lieferanten) — nicht gegen die harmonisierte Einstufung in Anhang VI (CLP) verifiziert. Der Gefahrenumfang kann breiter sein als die amtliche Einstufung; vor der Verwendung mit dem aktuellen Sicherheitsdatenblatt des Lieferanten verifizieren.
Übersetzungen: CLP-Verordnung (EG) 1272/2008, Anhang III und IV. Daten: PubChem/NLM.
MolGod_TOX_SF2
☢️ Toxikologische Daten (IARC + EPA CTX)
🧬 IARC-Karzinogenitätseinstufung
IARC-Klassifizierung:
Kein individueller IARC-Eintrag für diese CAS
Keine eigene IARC-Monografie in den geprüften Verzeichnissen — dies ist KEINE Bestätigung für das Fehlen einer krebserzeugenden Wirkung. Prüfen Sie die CLP/GHS-Klassifizierung (Abschnitt CMR / GHS).
🔬 Arbeitsplatzgrenzwerte (PubChem × NIOSH/OSHA)
ℹ️ GHS-Meldungen der Lieferanten (Selbsteinstufung — nicht verbindlich)
Keine harmonisierte CLP-Klassifizierung (Anhang VI) für diese CAS-Nummer verfügbar. Die nachstehenden Codes sind aggregierte Selbsteinstufungen der Lieferanten (ECHA-C&L-Meldungen, bereitgestellt über PubChem) — sie sind KEINE harmonisierte Klassifizierung und können redundant sein. Verbindliche Quelle bleibt das Sicherheitsdatenblatt (SDB) des Lieferanten.
Höchstes gemeldetes Warnsignal: Danger
(gemäß Angaben der Meldenden, nicht verbindlich)
International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). 2024. "IARC Monographs on the Identification of Carcinogenic Hazards to Humans." Lyon: IARC. 🔗
U.S. EPA. 2024. "ECOTOX Knowledgebase." Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 🔗
ECHA. 2024. "Chemical Safety Assessment." European Chemicals Agency. 🔗
U.S. National Toxicology Program. 2024. Report on Carcinogens. 15th ed. Research Triangle Park, NC: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. 🔗
GESTIS. 2024. "GESTIS Substance Database." Institute for Occupational Safety and Health of the German Social Accident Insurance (DGUV). 🔗
U.S. EPA. 2024. "CompTox Chemicals Dashboard." Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 🔗
ECHA. 2023. "Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures (CLP), Annex VI — Harmonised Classification." European Chemicals Agency. 🔗
Leist, Marcel, et al. 2014. "Consensus Report on the Future of Animal-Free Systemic Toxicity Testing." ALTEX 31 (3): 341–356. [DOI]
Hartung, Thomas. 2009. "Toxicology for the Twenty-First Century." Nature 460 (7252): 208–212. [DOI]
Lenga, Robert E., ed. 2008. The Sigma-Aldrich Library of Chemical Safety Data. 2nd ed. Milwaukee: Sigma-Aldrich.
Slikker, William Jr., et al. 2004. "Dose-Dependent Terminal and Tissue Residues After Chronic Exposure." Toxicological Sciences 81 (2): 253–279. [DOI]
📦 Kleine Verschüttung (<1L) — Bindemittel: nicht brennbares Absorptionsmittel (Vermiculit, Kieselgur)
⚠️ GENERISCHES Verfahren, abgeleitet aus der GHS-Klassifizierung (keine kuratierten Daten für diese CAS). Verwenden Sie stets das aktuelle Sicherheitsdatenblatt (SDB) des Lieferanten.
1. Zündquellen entfernen; Funkenbildung und offenes Feuer verboten.
2. Lüften, um Dämpfe zu zerstreuen; geerdete, funkensichere Werkzeuge verwenden.
3. Mit nicht brennbarem Absorptionsmittel bestreuen; in einen belüfteten / UN-Behälter aufnehmen.
4. Bereich mit Wasser abwaschen; Rückstände und Absorptionsmittel als gefährlichen Abfall behandeln.
Zusätzliche Eigenschaften aus GHS:
• giftig — Atemschutz, Kontakt vermeiden
• reizend — Kontakt mit Haut/Augen und Einatmen von Staub vermeiden
🛢️ Große Verschüttung (>1L) ⚠️ HAZMAT
1. Evakuieren; alle Zündquellen beseitigen, Dampfkonzentration (UEG) überwachen.
2. Vollständige antistatische PSA; funkensichere Ausrüstung. Löschen: Schaum/Pulver/CO2 — KEIN Wasservollstrahl.
3. Mechanisch in einen gekennzeichneten UN-Behälter aufnehmen; einem befugten Unternehmen (BDO) übergeben.
4. Vorfall gemäß Arbeitsschutzverfahren melden; bei Freisetzung in die Umwelt die Woiwodschaftsinspektion für Umweltschutz (WIOŚ) benachrichtigen.
🩹 Erste Hilfe
🧴 Haut
1. Kontaminierte Kleidung entfernen.
2. Haut mit viel Wasser für ≥15 min abspülen.
3. Die Substanz kann über die Haut aufgenommen werden — Symptome beobachten / Arzt.
👁️ Augen
1. Mit Wasser ≥15 min spülen, Augenlider gespreizt; Kontaktlinsen herausnehmen.
2. Augenarzt bei anhaltender Reizung.
🫁 Einatmen
1. An die frische Luft bringen, bequeme Lagerung.
2. Bei Atemnot — Sauerstoff / Arzt.
🍽️ Verschlucken
1. Mund mit Wasser ausspülen; KEIN Erbrechen auslösen.
2. Giftinformationszentrum: +48 42 631 46 24.
🌍 Umwelt:
Wasser: MEDIUM; Boden: LOW; ❌ Nicht in die Kanalisation einleiten; Abfallschlüssel: 16 05 06*
European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). 2020. Guidance on the Compilation of Safety Data Sheets — Section 6: Accidental Release Measures. ECHA.
[Link ↗]
European Parliament and Council. 2008. Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP) — Hazard classes and H-statements. Official Journal of the European Union L 353.
[Link ↗]
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). 2023. Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards — NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. CDC.
[Link ↗]
U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. 2024. 29 CFR 1910.120 — Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response (HAZWOPER). U.S. Code of Federal Regulations.
[Link ↗]
National Fire Protection Association. 2018. NFPA 472: Standard for Competence of Responders to Hazardous Materials/Weapons of Mass Destruction Incidents. NFPA.
[Link ↗]
European Parliament and Council. 2012. Directive 2012/18/EU on the Control of Major-Accident Hazards Involving Dangerous Substances (Seveso III). Official Journal of the European Union L 197: 1–37.
[Link ↗]
U.S. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. 2024. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[Link ↗]
European Chemicals Agency. 2020. Guidance on the Compilation of Safety Data Sheets (SDS), Version 3.1. ECHA.
[Link ↗]
Quellen: GHS/CLP-Klassifizierung (PubChem/SDB) — generischer Fallback · ECHA Guidance on SDS (Abschn. 6) · NIOSH Pocket Guide.
Nur Richtwerte — befolgen Sie im Notfall stets die Anweisungen des Lieferanten + die lokalen Arbeitsschutzvorschriften.
📋 Vollständige BDO-Liste:bdo.mos.gov.pl ↗
— offizielles Register des Ministeriums für Klima und Umwelt. Abfallübergabeschein (KPO):BDO-Vorlage
obligatorisch für jede Lieferung gefährlicher Abfälle.
European Commission. 2014. Commission Decision 2014/955/EU on the list of waste pursuant to Directive 2008/98/EC. Official Journal of the European Union. Decyzja 2014/955/UE. [link ↗] — European List of Waste (LoW) — 6-stellige EWC-Codes + Sternchen für gefährlich
Ministerstwo Klimatu i Środowiska Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej. 2020. Rozporządzenie Ministra Klimatu z dnia 2 stycznia 2020 r. w sprawie katalogu odpadów. Dziennik Ustaw RP 2020 poz. 10. [link ↗] — Polnischer Abfallkatalog — Umsetzung der Entscheidung 2014/955/EU
Główny Inspektorat Ochrony Środowiska (GIOŚ). 2024. Baza Danych O Odpadach (BDO) — System rejestracji firm utylizacyjnych. Ministerstwo Klimatu i Środowiska. [link ↗] — Zentrales BDO-Register — vollständige Liste der zur Abfallwirtschaft befugten Unternehmen
Polska — Sejm RP. 2012. Ustawa z dnia 14 grudnia 2012 r. o odpadach. Dz.U. 2013 poz. 21 (z późn. zm.). [link ↗] — Nationales Gesetz — definiert die Pflichten des Abfallerzeugers + Registrierung in der polnischen Abfalldatenbank (BDO)
Furr, A. Keith, ed.. 2000. CRC Handbook of Laboratory Safety. CRC Press. — Klassifizierung von Laborabfällen + Trennverfahren (Kapitel Waste Management); EN 374:2013 Handschuhstandards für Personen, die mit gefährlichen Abfällen umgehen.
Pohanish, Richard P.. 2017. Sittig's Handbook of Toxic and Hazardous Chemicals and Carcinogens. Elsevier. — Abfallklassifizierung pro CAS + Unverträglichkeiten — Eingabe für das EWC-Mapping.
Lewis, Richard J.. 2012. Sax's Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials. Wiley. — Reaktivität + Lagerverträglichkeit von Abfällen (Oxidationsmittel vs. brennbare Stoffe — getrennte Ströme).
NIOSH. 2024. Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. [link ↗] — PEL/REL/IDLH pro CAS — Grundlage für die beim Abfalltransport erforderliche PSA (KPO — Abfallübergabeschein).
OSHA. 2024. Occupational Chemical Database — Hazardous Waste Operations (HAZWOPER). Occupational Safety and Health Administration. [link ↗] — 29 CFR 1910.120 — Schulungen + PSA für den Umgang mit gefährlichen Abfällen.
European Parliament and Council. 2008. Directive 2008/98/EC on waste (Waste Framework Directive). Official Journal of the European Union L 312/3. [link ↗] — Abfallhierarchie (Vermeidung → Verwertung → Beseitigung); definiert "gefährlichen Abfall".
European Parliament and Council. 2009. Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP) on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures. Official Journal of the European Union L 353. [link ↗] — CLP-Klassifizierung von H-Sätzen → Mapping auf EWC * (Sternchen = gefährlich).
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). 2023. European Agreement concerning the International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road (ADR 2023). UNECE. [link ↗] — ADR — Anforderungen an den Transport gefährlicher Abfälle (KPO — Abfallübergabeschein + UN-Nummer + Klassen 1–9).
IPCS INCHEM. 2024. International Programme on Chemical Safety — Waste Management Guidelines. WHO/UNEP/ILO. [link ↗] — Internationale Leitlinien zur Neutralisation + Entsorgung pro CAS.
European Parliament and Council. 2006. Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 on Shipments of Waste. Official Journal of the European Union L 190: 1–98. [link ↗] — Grenzüberschreitende Verbringung gefährlicher Abfälle — Notifizierungs- + Zustimmungspflichten vor dem Export
ℹ️ Checkliste der regulatorischen Pflichten dla CAS 56-69-9.
Status basierend auf: ADR 2023 (Tabelle A), REACH Anhang XVII, CLP Anhang VI (harmonisierte Einstufung), Gefahrenklasse aus der m14-spill-DB, SVHC, GIS und der polnischen NDS-Liste. Grundsatz: keine Daten = keine Aussage (wir erklären NICHT "keine Beschränkungen" ohne Grundlage).
So gewährleisten Sie die Konformität: Das Etikett muss enthalten: GHS-Piktogramme, das Signalwort (Gefahr/Achtung), H-Sätze (Gefahrenhinweise) und P-Sätze (Sicherheitshinweise), Herstellerangaben. Erforderlich seit 2010 (Stoffe) und 2015 (Gemische).
So gewährleisten Sie die Konformität: Laborpersonal: Erstschulung (allgemeine Unterweisung + arbeitsplatzbezogen) + Auffrischung alle 5 Jahre (oder alle 3 Jahre für ingenieurtechnische Positionen). Dokumentation in der Personalakte.
So gewährleisten Sie die Konformität: Die BDO-Registrierung ist für Erzeuger gefährlicher Abfälle verpflichtend. Für jede Lieferung ist eine Abfallübergabekarte (KPO) erforderlich. Jahresbericht bis zum 15. März des Folgejahres.
Rechtsgrundlage: Ustawa z 14 grudnia 2012 r. o odpadach (Dz.U. 2013 poz. 21)
So gewährleisten Sie die Konformität: Keine ADR-Daten im MOL-GOD-Datensatz für diese CAS-Nummer. Nehmen Sie NICHT an, dass keine Beschränkungen bestehen — überprüfen Sie vor dem Versand die Transporteinstufung in ADR 2023 (Tabelle A) und in Abschnitt 14 des Sicherheitsdatenblatts (SDS).
Rechtsgrundlage: Umowa europejska ADR 2023 + Ustawa z 19 sierpnia 2011 r. o przewozie towarów niebezpiecznych
So gewährleisten Sie die Konformität: Importeure/Hersteller ab ≥1 Tonne/Jahr müssen die Substanz bei der ECHA registrieren (technisches Dossier + Chemical Safety Report bei ≥10 t). Prüfen Sie die ECHA Annex VI / registered substances list.
So gewährleisten Sie die Konformität: Nicht bestätigt in der SVHC-Kandidatenliste (REACH Art. 59) im MOL-GOD-Datensatz (unvollständiger Datensatz). Das Fehlen ist KEINE Bestätigung — prüfen Sie die aktuelle ECHA-Kandidatenliste. Die Kandidatenliste ist NICHT Anhang XIV.
⚪REACH Anhang XIV (Zulassungsliste)nicht zutreffend
So gewährleisten Sie die Konformität: Nicht bestätigt auf der REACH-Anhang-XIV-Zulassungsliste im MOL-GOD-Datensatz (unvollständiger Datensatz). Das Fehlen ist KEINE Bestätigung — prüfen Sie die ECHA-Zulassungsliste.
Rechtsgrundlage: Rozporządzenie (WE) 1907/2006 (REACH) Załącznik XIV — autoryzacja
⚪REACH Anhang XVII (Verwendungs-/Vermarktungsbeschränkungen)nicht zutreffend
So gewährleisten Sie die Konformität: Nicht im MOL-GOD-Beschränkungsdatensatz zu REACH Anhang XVII aufgeführt (unvollständiger Datensatz). Das Fehlen ist KEINE Bestätigung, dass keine Beschränkungen bestehen — prüfen Sie im Zweifelsfall den konsolidierten Anhang XVII auf den ECHA-Seiten.
Rechtsgrundlage: Rozporządzenie (WE) 1907/2006 (REACH) Załącznik XVII — ograniczenia produkcji/obrotu/stosowania
❓NDS — Höchstzulässige Konzentration am Arbeitsplatzzu überprüfen
So gewährleisten Sie die Konformität: Keine NDS-Daten im MOL-GOD-Datensatz (unvollständiger Datensatz — ~41 von ~600 Substanzen der Liste). Das Fehlen bedeutet NICHT, dass kein NDS existiert — prüfen Sie die vollständige Liste in Dz.U. 2024 poz. 1017 (Verordnung des Ministeriums für Familie und Sozialpolitik vom 4. September 2024) und wenden Sie andernfalls die OEL aus EU-Richtlinien oder von NIOSH/ACGIH empfohlene Werte an.
Rechtsgrundlage: Rozp. MRiPS z 4 września 2024 r. (Dz.U. 2024 poz. 1017) — NDS i NDSCh
So gewährleisten Sie die Konformität: Nie figuruje w dostępnym zbiorze roboczym prekursorów (lista niepełna). Nieobecność NIE jest potwierdzeniem — zweryfikuj wobec zał. I Rozp. (WE) 273/2004 i wykazu GIS przed obrotem.
Rechtsgrundlage: Rozp. (WE) 273/2004 + Ustawa o przeciwdziałaniu narkomanii (Dz.U. 2005 nr 179 poz. 1485)
European Parliament and Council. 2008. Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures (CLP). Official Journal of the European Union L 353/1. CLP Regulation 1272/2008. [link ↗] — Einstufung, Kennzeichnung und Verpackung von Stoffen + Gemischen (GHS-Umsetzung in der EU)
European Parliament and Council. 2006. Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH). Official Journal of the European Union L 396/1. REACH Regulation 1907/2006. [link ↗] — REACH — Registrierung, Bewertung und Zulassung von Chemikalien; SVHC; SDS Anhang II
Ministerstwo Rodziny i Polityki Społecznej Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej. 2024. Rozporządzenie Ministra Rodziny i Polityki Społecznej z dnia 4 września 2024 r. w sprawie najwyższych dopuszczalnych stężeń i natężeń czynników szkodliwych dla zdrowia w środowisku pracy. Dziennik Ustaw RP 2024 poz. 1017. [link ↗] — NDS und NDSCh für ~600 chemische Substanzen — aktuelle polnische Arbeitsplatzgrenzwerte
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). 2023. European Agreement concerning the International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road (ADR), 2023 Edition. United Nations, Geneva. ADR 2023. [link ↗] — Internationales Übereinkommen über den Straßentransport gefährlicher Güter — UN-Nummern, Klassen, Verpackungen
📚 Konsolidierte wissenschaftliche Referenzen — Chicago Author-Date 10 Quellen
Referenzen aus allen Safety-Hub-Registerkarten gesammelt. CAS: 56-69-9 ·
PubChem ↗
Parlament Europejski i Rada UE. 2008. "Rozporządzenie (WE) nr 1272/2008 w sprawie klasyfikacji, oznakowania i pakowania substancji (CLP)." Dz.Urz. UE L 353. [↗]
GHS, Vorschriften
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). 2021. "Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS), Ninth Revised Edition." United Nations, Geneva. [↗]
GHS
Goldfrank, Lewis R., Robert S. Hoffman, Mary Ann Howland, et al.. 2019. "Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies, 11th ed.." McGraw-Hill Education, New York. ISBN 978-1-25-985961-8.
Pierwsza pomoc, Toksykologia
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). 2023. "NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards (DHHS Publ. 2005-149)." U.S. Department of Health and Human Services / CDC, Cincinnati, OH. [↗]
Pierwsza pomoc, PPE, Toksykologia
European Committee for Standardization (CEN). 2016. "EN 374-1:2016 — Protective gloves against dangerous chemicals and micro-organisms." CEN, Brussels. [↗]
PPE
UNECE. 2023. "European Agreement Concerning the International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road (ADR 2023)." United Nations, Geneva. [↗]
Utylizacja, Regulacje
National Fire Protection Association (NFPA). 2022. "NFPA 400 — Hazardous Materials Code." NFPA, Quincy, MA. [↗]
Magazynowanie
Urben, P.G. (ed.). 2017. "Bretherick's Handbook of Reactive Chemical Hazards, 8th ed.." Butterworth-Heinemann / Elsevier, Oxford. [↗]
Magazynowanie
Ministerstwo Klimatu i Środowiska RP. 2023. "Baza danych o produktach i opakowaniach oraz o gospodarce odpadami (BDO)." Ministerstwo Klimatu i Środowiska, Warszawa. [↗]
Utylizacja
International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC / WHO). 2024. "IARC Monographs on the Identification of Carcinogenic Hazards to Humans — List of Classifications." WHO, Lyon. [↗]
Toksykologia
Registerkarten mit eigenen Referenzen (Emergency, PPE, Storage, Waste) enthalten zusätzliche bibliografische Einträge in ihren jeweiligen Abschnitten.
📈Analytische Statistik (t-Test · RSD · Grubbs · Q-Dixon)ICH Q2
MolGod_STATS_1
Fügen Sie eine Serie von Messwiederholungen ein (CSV oder eine Zahl pro Zeile). Der Rechner berechnet Mittelwert, Standardabweichung und 95% CI und erkennt Ausreißer (Grubbs + Dixon Q).
Trennzeichen: Komma, Leerzeichen, Tab, Zeilenumbruch. Min. 3 Messungen.
📐 Statistische Formeln
x̄ = Σxᵢ / n — arithmetisches Mittel
s² = Σ(xᵢ - x̄)² / (n-1) — Stichprobenvarianz
s = √s² — Standardabweichung
RSD% = (s / x̄) × 100% — relative Standardabweichung
Wählen Sie einen Puffer aus der Liste von 20 gängigen Systemen → geben Sie den Ziel-pH-Wert ein → Sie erhalten ein exaktes Rezept mit den einzuwiegenden Massen.
Schritt 1: Puffersystem wählen
Schritt 2: Pufferparameter
Schritt 3: Ihr Rezept
Schritt-für-Schritt-Verfahren:
📐 Berechnungsdetails (Henderson-Hasselbalch)
📜 Rezeptverlauf (letzte 10)
📅Project Planner — Manager für LaborexperimenteNEU
MolGod_PLANNER_1
Planen Sie Ihr gesamtes Laborprojekt: Fügen Sie Experimente mit Reagenzien, Wiederholungen und Dauer hinzu. Sie erhalten ein Gantt-Diagramm, eine Einkaufsliste (mit Links zum Shop!), ein Budget mit 10% Reserve und eine GHS-Risikomatrix.
💡 Melden Sie sich an, um Projekte zu speichern.
Ohne Anmeldung können Sie berechnen, aber nicht speichern.
🔬 HPLC/GC-Methoden (3 Methoden)
📄
Serum neurotransmitter analysis of motor and non-motor symptoms in Parkinson’s patients
UHPLCFrontiers in Aging Neuroscience202486% ✓CC-BYResearch method (specificity)
Säule: C18, 100 x 2.1 mm, 1.8 \u03bcm
Phase: mobile phase (water:acetonitrile = 99:1, formic acid 0
Detektion: MS/MS
Temp.: 80.0 °C
Gradient: elution procedure was as follows: 0–0
Fan Y, Yang W, Wu W, Wang X, Lin Y, Wu L, et al. Serum neurotransmitter analysis of motor and non-motor symptoms in Parkinson’s patients. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. 2024;16:1423120. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2024.1423120
Clinical symptoms of Parkinson’s disease (PD) are classified into motor and non-motor symptoms. Mental disorders, especially depression, are one of the major non-motor manifestations of PD. However, the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. In the present study, 21 neurotransmitters associated with mental disorders were measured in serum samples from patients and controls using the ultra-high performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) assay. Additionally, five clinical scales—the MDS Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), the Non-Motor Symptoms Scale (NMSS), the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA), and the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD)—were used to evaluate the severity of both motor and non-motor symptoms in PD patients. Analysis of neurotransmitter metabolism revealed significant changes in the tryptophan (Trp) metabolic pathway in PD patients. Specifically, levels of Trp, kynurenine (KYN), kynurenic acid (KA), nicotinamide (NAM), and 5-methoxyltryptamine (MeOTA) were substantially decreased. Additionally, three other excitation/inhibiting amino acids—glutamic acid (Glu), 4-aminobutyric acid (GABA), and aspartic acid (Asp)—also declined. Moreover, neurotransmitter conversion ratios, such as KA/KYN, nicotinamide/niacin (NAM/NA), 5-hydroxytryptophan/tryptophan (5-HTP/Trp), and quinolinic acid/kynurenic acid (QA/KA), provided more dynamic insights into disrupted neurotransmitter metabolism. Correlation analyses between scale scores and neurotransmitter levels showed that concentrations of xanthurenic acid (XA) and the turnover rate of 3-hydroxykynurenine (3-HK) were negatively correlated with UPDRS scores, while 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) and GABA levels were negatively correlated with non-motor symptoms in PD patients. In summary, this study elucidates, for the first time, the potential association and dynamics between altered neurotransmitter metabolism and the etiology of PD i...
Parkinson’s diseasemotor and non-motor symptomsUPLC-MS/MSneurotransmitter metabolismtryptophan
📄
Analysis of blood untargeted metabolomic characteristics of different subtypes of rosacea
HPLCFrontiers in Molecular Biosciences202595% ✓CC-BYResearch method (specificity, robustness)
Säule: C18, 1.7 \u03bcm
Phase: mobile phases were 10 mM ammonium formate in water (mobile phase A)…
Detektion: MS
Fluss: 0.35 mL/min
Temp.: 18.0 °C
Inj.: 180 \u03bcL
Gradient: elution was as follows: 0–1 min, 2% B; 1–9 min,…
Zhang K, Feng Y, Zhang X, He X, Qin S, Hu X, et al. Analysis of blood untargeted metabolomic characteristics of different subtypes of rosacea. Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences. 2025;12:1652995. doi:10.3389/fmolb.2025.1652995
BackgroundRosacea is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by vascular and neurological dysregulation, presenting with diverse clinical subtypes whose pathological mechanisms remain incompletely elucidated. Recent studies suggest that metabolic dysregulation may play a key role in disease onset and progression; however, systematic metabolomic studies targeting different subtypes remain limited.ObjectiveThis study employed untargeted metabolomic analysis to systematically compare plasma metabolic characteristic differences between patients with erythematotelangiectatic rosacea (ETR), papulopustular rosacea (PPR), and healthy controls (HC), aiming to identify potential disease biomarkers and provide new insights for understanding the pathogenesis of rosacea.MethodsUltra-high performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS) was used to compare metabolic profiles of plasma samples from ETR, PPR, and HC groups. Key differential metabolites identified were subjected to correlation analysis with disease severity and skin physiological parameters.ResultsETR patients primarily involved amino acid metabolism, carbon metabolism, and cholesterol metabolism pathways, with key metabolites including upregulated SSA and 2,3-DHPA, and downregulated TCDCA and Met. PPR patients primarily involved tryptophan and linoleic acid metabolism pathways, with key metabolites including upregulated 12-HSA, DGLA, and 5-ALA, and downregulated 5-HTP and 3-HPPA. Metabolic differences between different rosacea subtypes were associated with steroid hormone biosynthesis. DGLA showed positive correlation with disease severity, while 5-HTP showed negative correlation with disease severity. Met was closely related to skin barrier function. Both 12-HSA and DGLA showed positive correlation with sebum secretion.ConclusionThese findings elucidate the metabolic characteristics of rosacea and their associations with disease severity and skin physiological parameters, providing new theor...
Mechanistic Wound Healing and Antioxidant Potential of Moringa oleifera Seeds Extract Supported by Metabolic Profiling, In Silico Network Design, Molecular Docking, and In Vivo Studies
Phase: mobile phase was used, starting from 100% water in 0
Detektion: MS
Temp.: 40.0 °C
Inj.: 2 \u03bcL
Gradient: elution of mobile phase was used, starting from 100% water…
Shady N, Mostafa N, Fayez S, Abdel-Rahman I, Maher S, Zayed A, et al. Mechanistic Wound Healing and Antioxidant Potential of Moringa oleifera Seeds Extract Supported by Metabolic Profiling, In Silico Network Design, Molecular Docking, and In Vivo Studies. Antioxidants. 2022;11:1743. doi:10.3390/antiox11091743
Moringa oleifera Lam. (Moringaceae) is an adaptable plant with promising phytoconstituents, interesting medicinal uses, and nutritional importance. Chemical profiling of M. oleifera seeds assisted by LC-HRMS (HPLC system coupled to a high resolution mass detector) led to the dereplication of 19 metabolites. Additionally, the wound healing potential of M. oleifera seed extract was investigated in male New Zealand Dutch strain albino rabbits and supported by histopathological examinations. Moreover, the molecular mechanisms were investigated via different in vitro investigations and through analyzing the relative gene and protein expression patterns. When compared to the untreated and MEBO®-treated groups, topical administration of M. oleifera extract on excision wounds resulted in a substantial increase in wound healing rate (p < 0.001), elevating TGF-β1, VEGF, Type I collagen relative expression, and reducing inflammatory markers such as IL-1β and TNF-α. In vitro antioxidant assays showed that the extract displayed strong scavenging effects to peroxides and superoxide free radicals. In silico studies using a molecular docking approach against TNF-α, TGFBR1, and IL-1β showed that some metabolites in M. oleifera seed extract can bind to the active sites of three wound-healing related proteins. Protein–protein interaction (PPI) and compound–protein interaction (CPI) networks were constructed as well. Quercetin, caffeic acid, and kaempferol showed the highest connectivity with the putative proteins. In silico drug likeness studies revealed that almost all compounds comply with both Lipinski’s and Veber’s rule. According to the previous findings, an in vitro study was carried out on the pure compounds, including quercetin, kaempferol, and caffeic acid (identified from M. oleifera) to validate the proposed approach and to verify their potential effectiveness. Their inhibitory potential was evaluated against the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-6 and against the endopeptida...
Löslichkeitstheorie (angewendet in der Verträglichkeitsvorhersage):
Yalkowsky, Samuel H., and Shri C. Valvani. 1980. "Solubility and Partitioning I: Solubility of Nonelectrolytes in Water." Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 69 (8): 912–922. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.2600690814 — General Solubility Equation (GSE): logS = 0.5 − logP − 0.01(MP−25).
Hansen, Charles M. 2007. Hansen Solubility Parameters: A User's Handbook. 2nd ed. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420006834 — HSP triplet (dD, dP, dH) + wzór Ra.
Stefanis, E., and C. Panayiotou. 2008. "Prediction of Hansen Solubility Parameters with a New Group-Contribution Method." Int J Thermophys 29: 568–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-008-0415-z
Reichardt, Christian, and Thomas Welton. 2011. Solvents and Solvent Effects in Organic Chemistry. 4th ed. Wiley-VCH. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527632220 — E_T(30) polarity scale, solwatochromia.
Snyder, Lloyd R., Joseph J. Kirkland, and John W. Dolan. 2010. Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography. 3rd ed. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470508183 — Eluotropic series, polarity index.
Van Krevelen, D. W., and K. Te Nijenhuis. 2009. Properties of Polymers. 4th ed. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-054819-7.X0001-5 — Hoftyzer–Van Krevelen group contribution dla dD/dP/dH z SMILES.
Marcus, Yizhak. 1998. The Properties of Solvents. Wiley Series in Solution Chemistry, Vol. 4. ISBN 9780471983699 — Vollständige tabellarische Sammlung von 250+ Lösungsmitteln (ε, μ, Donizität, Akzeptorzahlen).
PubChem Compound Database — CAS 56-69-9 lookup ↗ — logP (XLogP3), water solubility experimental + predicted.
Vollständige Bibliografie im Akkordeon REFERENZEN (am Ende der Seite) — Chicago Manual of Style 17th ed., Author-Date.
🧮 Löslichkeitsrechner
Löslichkeit:—
logS:—
Methode:—
⚠️ —
Löslichkeit vs. Temperatur
🌐 Hansen Solubility Sphere (3D)
Je näher am Molekül (rote Kugel), desto besser das Lösungsmittel. · Erweitert: Beschriftungen + Gitter + Achsen + Pulsation.
Van Krevelen, D. W., and K. Te Nijenhuis. 2009. Properties of Polymers: Their Correlation with Chemical Structure; Their Numerical Estimation and Prediction from Additive Group Contributions. 4th ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier. [DOI ↗]
Stefanis, Eirini, and Costas Panayiotou. 2008. "Prediction of Hansen Solubility Parameters with a New Group-Contribution Method." International Journal of Thermophysics 29 (2): 568–585. [DOI ↗]
Hansen, Charles M. 2007. Hansen Solubility Parameters: A User's Handbook. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press. [DOI ↗]
Martin, Andre, Joel Newburger, and Alan Adjei. 1993. "Extended Hildebrand Solubility Approach: Solubility of Caffeine in Dioxane–Water Mixtures." Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 82 (3): 248–252. [DOI ↗]
Methode: Group Contribution (GC) — schnelle Schätzung von δD/δP/δH aus logP, wenn keine experimentellen Daten vorliegen. Genauigkeit ±2 MPa^½. Für höhere Präzision → HSPiP-Software.
❓ Jak przygotować roztwór standardowy 5-HTP o stężeniu 1 mg/mL?
MolGod_TECHFAQ_1_Q0
Aby przygotować roztwór standardowy 5-HTP o stężeniu 1 mg/mL, należy odważyć 1 mg substancji (co odpowiada około 0.0045 mmol) i rozpuścić w 1 mL rozpuszczalnika, np. metanolu lub wody dejonizowanej. Masa molowa 5-HTP wynosi 220.22 g/mol, więc 1 mg to 1/220.22 mmol ≈ 0.0045 mmol.
Hilfreich?
❓ Jak przechowywać 5-HTP?
MolGod_TECHFAQ_1_Q1
5-HTP należy przechowywać w temperaturze 2-8°C, chronić przed światłem (w nieprzezroczystym pojemniku) i wilgocią. Wilgotność względna powietrza powinna być niska (<40%). Okres przechowywania: do 12 miesięcy.
Hilfreich?
❓ Jaka metoda analityczna jest zalecana do oznaczania czystości 5-HTP?
MolGod_TECHFAQ_1_Q2
Zalecaną metodą jest HPLC (high-performance liquid chromatography) z detektorem UV (np. przy 240 nm). LogP 5-HTP wynosi około -1.2, co wskazuje na umiarkowaną hydrofilowość, dlatego HPLC jest odpowiednia. Masa molowa 220.22 g/mol potwierdza przydatność tej techniki.
Hilfreich?
❓ Jakie reakcje uboczne mogą wystąpić podczas syntezy lub oczyszczania 5-HTP?
MolGod_TECHFAQ_1_Q3
5-HTP może ulegać degradacji (hydrolizie) w obecności kwasów lub zasad. Reaguje też z utleniaczami (np. nadtlenkiem wodoru). Niezgodne chemicznie są silne kwasy/zasady oraz światło UV. Zaleca się stosowanie buforów i atmosfery azotu podczas syntezy.
Hilfreich?
❓ W jakim celu 5-HTP jest stosowany w laboratoriach badawczych?
MolGod_TECHFAQ_1_Q4
5-HTP jest używany jako prekursor serotoniny w badaniach neurobiologicznych, do syntezy leków przeciwdepresyjnych oraz jako standard w oznaczeniach biochemicznych. W laboratoriach stosuje się go również do kalibracji metod HPLC dla związków aminokwasopochodnych.
Drug-Likeness-Radardiagramm (Lipinski Ro5 / Veber). Grüne Zone = Übereinstimmung mit den Kriterien.
Vorhersagedaten — in silico berechnete Eigenschaften (SMILES/RDKit). Sie ersetzen keine klinischen Studien. Nicht zur Arzneimittelbewertung ohne experimentelle Verifizierung verwenden.
Lipinski, Christopher A., Franco Lombardo, Beryl W. Dominy, and Paul J. Feeney. 1997. "Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings." Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 23 (1-3): 3-25.
Veber, Daniel F., Stephen R. Johnson, Hung-Yuan Cheng, et al. 2002. "Molecular properties that influence the oral bioavailability of drug candidates." Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 45 (12): 2615-2623.
Daina, Antoine, Olivier Michielin, and Vincent Zoete. 2017. "SwissADME: a free web tool to evaluate pharmacokinetics, drug-likeness and medicinal chemistry friendliness." Scientific Reports 7: 42717.
Egan, William J., and Gregory Lauri. 2002. "Prediction of intestinal permeability." Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 54 (3): 273-289.
Baell, Jonathan B., and Georgina A. Holloway. 2010. "New substructure filters for removal of pan assay interference compounds (PAINS) from screening libraries." Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 53 (7): 2719-2740.
Brenk, Ruth, Alessandro Schipani, Daniel James, et al. 2008. "Lessons learnt from assembling screening libraries for drug discovery for neglected diseases." ChemMedChem 3 (3): 435-444.
Ertl, Peter, and Ansgar Schuffenhauer. 2009. "Estimation of synthetic accessibility score of drug-like molecules based on molecular complexity and fragment contributions." Journal of Cheminformatics 1: 8.
Bickerton, G. Richard, Gaia V. Paolini, Jérémy Besnard, Sorel Muresan, and Andrew L. Hopkins. 2012. "Quantifying the Chemical Beauty of Drugs." Nature Chemistry 4 (2): 90-98.
Hopkins, Andrew L., and Colin R. Groom. 2002. "The Druggable Genome." Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 1 (9): 727-730.
Ghose, Arup K., Vellarkad N. Viswanadhan, and John J. Wendoloski. 1999. "A Knowledge-Based Approach in Designing Combinatorial or Medicinal Chemistry Libraries for Drug Discovery." Journal of Combinatorial Chemistry 1 (1): 55-68.
Tice, Raymond R., Christopher P. Austin, Robert J. Kavlock, and John R. Bucher. 2013. "Improving the Human Hazard Characterization of Chemicals: A Tox21 Update." Environmental Health Perspectives 121 (7): 756-765.
Leeson, Paul D., and Brian Springthorpe. 2007. "The Influence of Drug-Like Concepts on Decision-Making in Medicinal Chemistry." Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 6 (11): 881-890.
Hann, Michael M. 2011. "Molecular Obesity, Potency and Other Addictions in Drug Discovery." MedChemComm 2 (5): 349-355.
Davies, Mark, Michał Nowotka, George Papadatos, et al. 2015. "ChEMBL Web Services: Streamlining Access to Drug Discovery Data and Utilities." Nucleic Acids Research 43 (W1): W612-W620.
Walters, W. Patrick, and Mark A. Murcko. 2002. "Prediction of 'Drug-Likeness.'". Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 54 (3): 255–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-409X(02)00003-0.
Congreve, Miles, Robin Carr, Christopher Murray, and Harren Jhoti. 2003. "A 'Rule of Three' for Fragment-Based Lead Discovery?" Drug Discovery Today 8 (19): 876–877. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6446(03)02831-9.
Brenk, Ruth, Alessandro Schipani, Daniel James, Agata Krasowski, Iain Hugh Gilbert, Julie Frearson, and Paul Graham Wyatt. 2008. "Lessons Learnt from Assembling Screening Libraries for Drug Discovery for Neglected Diseases." ChemMedChem 3 (3): 435-444.
Schomburg, Karen T., Sascha Bietz, Hans Briem, Andrea M. Henzler, Stefan Urbaczek, and Matthias Rarey. 2014. "Facing the Challenges of Structure-Based Target Prediction by Inverse Virtual Screening." Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 54 (6): 1676-1686.
Bemis, Guy W., and Mark A. Murcko. 1996. "The Properties of Known Drugs. 1. Molecular Frameworks." Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 39 (15): 2887-2893.
Schomburg, Karen T., and Matthias Rarey. 2014. "What Is the Potential of Structure-Based Target Prediction Methods?" Future Medicinal Chemistry 6 (17): 1987-1989.
Bolton, Evan E., Yanli Wang, Paul A. Thiessen, and Stephen H. Bryant. 2008. "PubChem: Integrated Platform of Small Molecules and Biological Activities." Annual Reports in Computational Chemistry 4: 217-241. [DOI ↗]
Kim, Sunghwan, Jie Chen, Tiejun Cheng, et al. 2023. "PubChem 2023 update." Nucleic Acids Research 51 (D1): D1373-D1380. [DOI ↗]
Kim, Sunghwan, Tiejun Cheng, Jianyong He, Chen Cheng, et al. 2021. "PubChem Protein, Pathway, Reaction, and Disease Specifications." Journal of Cheminformatics 13: 16. [DOI ↗]
Hähnke, Volker D., Sunghwan Kim, and Evan E. Bolton. 2018. "PubChem chemical structure standardization." Journal of Cheminformatics 10: 36. [DOI ↗]
Wang, Yanli, Stephen H. Bryant, Tiejun Cheng, Jiyao Wang, et al. 2017. "PubChem BioAssay: 2017 update." Nucleic Acids Research 45 (D1): D955-D963. [DOI ↗]
Cheng, Tiejun, et al. 2014. "Computation of Octanol-Water Partition Coefficients by Guiding an Additive Model with Knowledge." Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 54 (3): 793-805. [DOI ↗]
Wilkinson, Mark D., et al. 2016. "The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship." Scientific Data 3: 160018. [DOI ↗]
Hersey, Anne, et al. 2015. "Chemical databases: curation or integration by user-defined equivalence?" Drug Discovery Today: Technologies 14: 17-24.
Veber, Daniel F., Stephen R. Johnson, Hung-Yuan Cheng, Brian R. Smith, Keith W. Ward, and Kenneth D. Kopple. 2002. "Molecular Properties That Influence the Oral Bioavailability of Drug Candidates." Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 45 (12): 2615-2623.
ECHA. 2024. "REACH Guidance." European Chemicals Agency. ↗
Magnussen, I., Nielsen‐Kudsk, F.. 1980. "Bioavailability and Related Pharmacokinetics in Man of Orally Administered L‐5‐Hydroxytryptophan in Steady State." Acta Pharmacologica et Toxicologica 46 (4): 257-262. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0773.1980.tb02451.x. [DOI ↗]
Groom, Colin R., Ian J. Bruno, Matthew P. Lightfoot, and Suzanna C. Ward. 2016. "The Cambridge Structural Database." Acta Crystallographica Section B 72 (2): 171-179. ↗
🧪Assistent zur Lösungsherstellung (Smart Prep)MolGod_PREP_2
Geben Sie ein, was Sie zubereiten möchten — ich erstelle eine SOP
Beispiele unten — zum Einfügen anklicken:
Fertige Rezepte:
📚 Überblick über die wissenschaftliche Literatur — CAS 56-69-9MolGod_LITHUB_MAIN
📊 Automatisch extrahierte Themen aus den Abstracts von 1 Publikationen für CAS 56-69-9.
Algorithmus: TF-IDF (Salton & Buckley 1988) — Termfrequenz × inverse Dokumentfrequenz.
Przeznaczenie: 5-HTP jest stosowany w przemyśle farmaceutycznym do produkcji leków, suplementów diety i kosmetyków. Może być również używany w laboratorium do badań naukowych i eksperymentów chemicznych.
Bezpieczeństwo
Ogólne wskazówki BHP:
– Pracuj z 5-HTP w dobrze wentylowanym pomieszczeniu. Unikaj kontaktu ze skórą i oczami. W razie potrzeby stosuj rękawice ochronne i okulary.
– Przestrzegaj zalecanych procedur bezpieczeństwa i nosić odpowiedni sprzęt ochronny, taki jak maski filtrujące i kombinezony.”
Przechowywanie
Warunki magazynowania:
– 5-HTP należy przechowywać w suchym i chłodnym miejscu, z dala od bezpośredniego światła słonecznego.
– Trzymaj substancję poza zasięgiem dzieci i zwierząt domowych.”
Snyder, Lloyd R., John W. Dolan, and Joseph J. Kirkland. 2010. Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography. Wiley. — Chapter 9 — gradient elution, LSS theory (cited as Snyder et al. 2010 in tool description).
Schoenmakers, Peter J. 1986. Optimization of Chromatographic Selectivity: A Guide to Method Development. Elsevier. — Numerical optimization of gradient programs.
Snyder, L. R., and J. W. Dolan. 2007. High-Performance Gradient Elution: The Practical Application of the Linear-Solvent-Strength Model. Wiley. — Foundational LSS reference for the %B_init = 5 + 8·logP heuristic implemented here.
Nikitas, Pavlos, and Adrian Pappa-Louisi. 2009. "Retention models for isocratic and gradient elution in reversed-phase liquid chromatography." Journal of Chromatography A 1216: 1737-1755. [DOI ↗] — Modern review of gradient retention models — basis for non-LSS extensions.
Carr, Peter W.. 2009. "The new physical chemistry of HPLC." Journal of Chromatography A 1216: 1764-1772. [DOI ↗]
Dong, Michael W. 2019. HPLC and UHPLC for Practicing Scientists. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119313793. — Modern UHPLC gradient programming, sub-2 µm scaling rules.
Wu, Naijun, and Anton M. Clausen. 2007. "Fundamental and practical aspects of ultrahigh pressure liquid chromatography for fast separations." Journal of Separation Science 30: 1167-1182. [DOI ↗]
Stoll, Dwight R., and Peter W. Carr. 2017. "Two-Dimensional Liquid Chromatography: A State of the Art Tutorial." Analytical Chemistry 89: 519-531. [DOI ↗] — Reference for orthogonal gradient design (2D-LC second dimension).
Dolan, John W.. 2013. "When to Modify Method Conditions." LCGC North America 31: 192-199.
Meyer, Veronika R. 2010. Practical High-Performance Liquid Chromatography. Wiley. — Chapter 7 — practical gradient design with isokratyczny scouting.
Stoll, Dwight R., and Peter W. Carr. 2017. "Two-Dimensional Liquid Chromatography: A State of the Art Tutorial." Analytical Chemistry 89: 519-531. [DOI ↗]
Carr, Peter W.. 2009. "The new physical chemistry of HPLC." Journal of Chromatography A 1216: 1764-1772. [DOI ↗]
Wu, Naijun, and Anton M. Clausen. 2007. "Fundamental and practical aspects of ultrahigh pressure liquid chromatography for fast separations." Journal of Separation Science 30: 1167-1182. [DOI ↗]
Engelhardt, Heinz. 2014. 100 Years of Chromatography. Wiley-VCH.
Vivó-Truyols, Gabriel, and Hans-Gerd Janssen. 2010. "Probabilistic approach to peak deconvolution in chromatography." Analytical Chemistry 82: 8525-8531. [DOI ↗]
Berechnen Sie den USP-Tailing-Faktor (T) und die Asymmetrie (As) aus den Peak-Halbwertsbreiten. Geben Sie a (linke Halbbreite) und b (rechte Halbbreite) an, gemessen bei 5% oder 10% der Peakhöhe.
📚 References (Chicago Author-Date)
USP General Chapter <621>. 2024. "Chromatography." United States Pharmacopeial Convention. [link ↗] — Defines USP Tailing Factor T = (a+b)/(2a) measured at 5% peak height.
International Council for Harmonisation (ICH). 2023. "Validation of Analytical Procedures Q2(R2)." ICH Expert Working Group. [link ↗] — Tailing factor is a system suitability parameter (Section 6).
Foley, Joe P., and John G. Dorsey. 1983. "Equations for calculation of chromatographic figures of merit for ideal and skewed peaks." Analytical Chemistry 55: 730-737 https://doi.org/10.1021/ac00255a033 [link ↗] — Original asymmetry factor As = b/a at 10% height (Foley & Dorsey 1983).
Snyder, Lloyd R., Joseph J. Kirkland, and John W. Dolan. 2010. "Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography." Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470508183 [link ↗] — Chapter 2.4 — peak shape diagnostics and remedies.
Dolan, John W.. 2003. "Peak tailing and resolution." LCGC North America 21: 610-614 [link ↗] — How tailing factor degrades effective resolution.
Vivó-Truyols, Gabriel, and Hans-Gerd Janssen. 2010. "Probabilistic approach to peak deconvolution in chromatography." Analytical Chemistry 82: 8525-8531 https://doi.org/10.1021/ac101742z [link ↗] — Modern numerical deconvolution for asymmetric peaks.
Kromidas, Stavros. 2017. "HPLC Made to Measure: A Practical Handbook for Optimization." Wiley-VCH. — Practical Tf and As thresholds for routine QC.
Dong, Michael W.. 2019. "HPLC and UHPLC for Practicing Scientists." Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119313793 [link ↗]
Heyden, Yvan Vander, et al.. 2009. "Robustness of pharmaceutical liquid chromatographic methods." Journal of Chromatography B 877: 2120-2129 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2008.10.052 [link ↗]
Stoll, Dwight R., and Peter W. Carr. 2017. "Two-Dimensional Liquid Chromatography: A State of the Art Tutorial." Analytical Chemistry 89: 519-531 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.6b03506 [link ↗]
Carr, Peter W.. 2009. "The new physical chemistry of HPLC." Journal of Chromatography A 1216: 1764-1772 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2008.11.094 [link ↗]
Wu, Naijun, and Anton M. Clausen. 2007. "Fundamental and practical aspects of ultrahigh pressure liquid chromatography for fast separations." Journal of Separation Science 30: 1167-1182 https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.200700026 [link ↗]
Engelhardt, Heinz. 2014. "100 Years of Chromatography." Wiley-VCH.
Vivó-Truyols, Gabriel, and Hans-Gerd Janssen. 2010. "Probabilistic approach to peak deconvolution in chromatography." Analytical Chemistry 82: 8525-8531 https://doi.org/10.1021/ac101742z [link ↗]
📊 Rechner für Auflösung und Bodenzahl (Rs, N, H)FEATURE K
Berechnen Sie die Auflösung Rs, die theoretische Bodenzahl N und HETP (H) für ein Paar von HPLC-Peaks. Geben Sie die Retentionszeiten, Peakbreiten (bei 50% oder an der Basis) und die Säulenlänge an.
📚 References (Chicago Author-Date)
Snyder, Lloyd R., Joseph J. Kirkland, and John W. Dolan. 2010. "Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography." 3rd ed. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0-470-16754-0. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470508183 [link ↗] — Chapter 2 covers resolution, plate count and HETP fundamentals (Snyder et al. 2010).
USP General Chapter <621>. 2024. "Chromatography." USP-NF 2024 ed. United States Pharmacopeial Convention. [link ↗] — Defines Rs >= 1.5 acceptance criterion and N calculation methods.
Dolan, John W.. 2003. "How much resolution is enough?." LCGC North America 21: 350-353 [link ↗] — Practical guidance on Rs targets for routine method development.
Van Deemter, J. J., F. J. Zuiderweg, and A. Klinkenberg. 1956. "Longitudinal diffusion and resistance to mass transfer as causes of nonideality in chromatography." Chemical Engineering Science 5: 271-289 https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(56)80003-1 [link ↗] — Origin of N = 5.54·(tr/w0.5)² half-height plate count formulation.
Giddings, J. Calvin. 1965. "Dynamics of Chromatography, Part I: Principles and Theory." Marcel Dekker. ISBN 978-0-8247-1357-7. — Resolution equation Rs = (1/4)·√N·(α-1)/α·k/(1+k) (master equation).
Foley, Joe P., and John G. Dorsey. 1983. "Equations for calculation of chromatographic figures of merit for ideal and skewed peaks." Analytical Chemistry 55: 730-737 https://doi.org/10.1021/ac00255a033 [link ↗] — Skewed-peak corrections to apparent N.
Knox, John H.. 1977. "Practical aspects of LC theory." Journal of Chromatographic Science 15: 352-364 https://doi.org/10.1093/chromsci/15.9.352 [link ↗]
Carr, Peter W.. 2009. "The new physical chemistry of HPLC." Journal of Chromatography A 1216: 1764-1772 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2008.11.094 [link ↗]
Dong, Michael W.. 2019. "HPLC and UHPLC for Practicing Scientists." 2nd ed. Wiley. ISBN 978-1-119-31378-3. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119313793 [link ↗]
Stoll, Dwight R., and Peter W. Carr. 2017. "Two-Dimensional Liquid Chromatography: A State of the Art Tutorial." Analytical Chemistry 89: 519-531 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.6b03506 [link ↗]
Carr, Peter W.. 2009. "The new physical chemistry of HPLC." Journal of Chromatography A 1216: 1764-1772 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2008.11.094 [link ↗]
Wu, Naijun, and Anton M. Clausen. 2007. "Fundamental and practical aspects of ultrahigh pressure liquid chromatography for fast separations." Journal of Separation Science 30: 1167-1182 https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.200700026 [link ↗]
Engelhardt, Heinz. 2014. "100 Years of Chromatography." 2nd ed. Wiley-VCH. ISBN 978-3-527-33473-5.
Vivó-Truyols, Gabriel, and Hans-Gerd Janssen. 2010. "Probabilistic approach to peak deconvolution in chromatography." Analytical Chemistry 82: 8525-8531 https://doi.org/10.1021/ac101742z [link ↗]
zł39.76Select options
This product has multiple variants. The options may be chosen on the product page
🧪 Systemeignung — Live-Rechner (USP <621>)FEATURE L
Geben Sie Daten aus 5-6 Injektionen ein (Flächen, tR, Tailing, Böden) — der Rechner berechnet %RSD, Mittelwerte und prüft die Konformität mit USP <621>. Sie können CSV (kommagetrennt) einfügen oder einzelne Werte bearbeiten.
📚 References (Chicago Author-Date)
USP General Chapter <621>. 2024. "Chromatography (System Suitability section)." USP-NF 2024 ed. United States Pharmacopeial Convention. [link ↗] — Defines RSD area < 2%, tailing < 2.0, N > 2000 acceptance criteria.
International Council for Harmonisation (ICH). 2023. "Validation of Analytical Procedures Q2(R2)." ICH Expert Working Group. [link ↗] — Section 5.4 — system suitability is part of method validation.
US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 2018. "Reviewer Guidance: Validation of Chromatographic Methods." US Food and Drug Administration. [link ↗] — CDER reviewer perspective on chromatographic validation expectations.
Snyder, Lloyd R., Joseph J. Kirkland, and John W. Dolan. 2010. "Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography." 3rd ed. Wiley. — Chapter 2 — system suitability fundamentals (RSD, Tf, N).
Heyden, Yvan Vander, et al.. 2009. "Robustness of pharmaceutical liquid chromatographic methods." — Robustness vs. system suitability — design-of-experiments framework.
Rozet, Eric, et al.. 2013. "Analysis of recent pharmaceutical regulatory documents on analytical method validation."
European Medicines Agency (EMA). 2011. "Guideline on bioanalytical method validation EMEA/CHMP/EWP/192217/2009." EMA. [link ↗] — EMA companion guideline with bioanalytical SS criteria.
Dong, Michael W.. 2019. "HPLC and UHPLC for Practicing Scientists." 2nd ed. Wiley. — UHPLC-specific suitability adjustments (n=5 vs. n=6).
Kazakevich, Yuri V., and Rosario LoBrutto, eds.. 2007. "HPLC for Pharmaceutical Scientists." Wiley-Interscience.
AOAC International. 2016. "Appendix F: Guidelines for Standard Method Performance Requirements." AOAC INTERNATIONAL. [link ↗] — Alternative SS thresholds for food/dietary samples.
Stoll, Dwight R., and Peter W. Carr. 2017. "Two-Dimensional Liquid Chromatography: A State of the Art Tutorial."
Carr, Peter W.. 2009. "The new physical chemistry of HPLC."
Wu, Naijun, and Anton M. Clausen. 2007. "Fundamental and practical aspects of ultrahigh pressure liquid chromatography for fast separations."
Engelhardt, Heinz. 2014. "100 Years of Chromatography." 2nd ed. Wiley-VCH.
Vivó-Truyols, Gabriel, and Hans-Gerd Janssen. 2010. "Probabilistic approach to peak deconvolution in chromatography."
📤 Betten Sie dieses Molekül auf Ihrer Website ein
MolGod_EMBED_1
Haben Sie einen Blog, ein Forum oder einen wissenschaftlichen Dienst? Betten Sie das interaktive 3D-Molekül auf Ihrer Website ein — jeder Ihrer Leser sieht es, und darunter gibt es einen Link zu unserem Shop, wo er das Reagenz kaufen kann.
📱 QR code (zum Druck auf Flyern / Etiketten / Katalogen)
Platzieren Sie ihn in einem Produktkatalog, auf einem Flaschenetikett oder einem Flyer. Der Kunde scannt ihn — sieht das 3D-Molekül auf seinem Telefon, mit einem Link zu Ihrem Shop.
Wenn Sie den Link teilen, ruft Facebook/LinkedIn/Discord automatisch die Bildvorschau ab:
📋 Lizenz: Der Embed behält einen Backlink zu Marmak Chemicals (erforderlich — der Shop ist die Datenquelle). Chemische Daten stammen von PubChem (CC0 — gemeinfrei). Der Embed ist KOSTENLOS für Bildungs-, kommerzielle und Hobbyzwecke.
📚 REFERENZEN (Gesammelte Bibliografie, Chicago Author-Date) 104 Einträge
MolGod_REFS_1
Alle wissenschaftlichen Quellen, die in den Akkordeons oben für CAS 56-69-9 zitiert werden. Format: Chicago Manual of Style, 17. Aufl., Autor-Datum-System.
AIST. 2026. Spectral Database for Organic Compounds (SDBS): CAS 56-69-9. Tsukuba, Japan: National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology. https://sdbs.db.aist.go.jp/. (Accessed 2026-08-01.)
PubChem. 2026. PubChem Compound Summary: CAS 56-69-9. Bethesda, MD: National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), National Library of Medicine. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/#query=56-69-9. (Accessed 2026-08-01.)
European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). 2024. "Annex VI to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP) — Harmonised Classification and Labelling." ECHA, Helsinki / Official Journal of the European Union. https://echa.europa.eu/regulations/clp/clp-classification.
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). 2017. "Recommendations for Chemical Protective Clothing: A Companion to the NIOSH Pocket Guide." U.S. Department of Health & Human Services / CDC. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ncpc/default.html.
Connors, Kenneth A., Gordon L. Amidon, and Valentino J. Stella. 1986. Chemical Stability of Pharmaceuticals: A Handbook for Pharmacists, 2nd ed.. New York: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471734683.
Rumble, John R., ed. 2019. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics: 100th Edition. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. https://hbcp.chemnetbase.com/.
IARC. 2026. IARC Monographs on the Identification of Carcinogenic Hazards to Humans: CAS 56-69-9. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization. (Accessed 2026-08-01.)
📄 Wissenschaftliche Artikel (peer-reviewed)
Stefanis, Emmanuel, and Costas Panayiotou. 2008. "Prediction of Hansen Solubility Parameters with a New Group-Contribution Method." International Journal of Thermophysics 29: 568-585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-008-0415-z.
Stoll, Vincent S., and John S. Blanchard. 1990. "Buffers: Principles and Practice: In Methods in Enzymology, vol. 182." San Diego: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(90)82008-P.
European Parliament. 2008. "Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures (CLP)." Official Journal of the European Union L 353: 1–1355.
United Nations. 2021. Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS). 9th revised ed. ST/SG/AC.10/30/Rev.9. New York and Geneva: United Nations. https://unece.org/ghs-rev9-2021.
Snyder, Lloyd R., John W. Dolan, and Joseph J. Kirkland. 2010. Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography. Wiley.
Schoenmakers, Peter J.. 1986. Optimization of Chromatographic Selectivity: A Guide to Method Development. Elsevier.
Snyder, L. R., and J. W. Dolan. 2007. High-Performance Gradient Elution: The Practical Application of the Linear-Solvent-Strength Model. Wiley.
Nikitas, Pavlos, and Adrian Pappa-Louisi. 2009. "Retention models for isocratic and gradient elution in reversed-phase liquid chromatography." Journal of Chromatography A 1216: 1737-1755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2008.10.005.
Wu, Naijun, and Anton M. Clausen. 2007. "Fundamental and practical aspects of ultrahigh pressure liquid chromatography for fast separations." Journal of Separation Science 30: 1167-1182. https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.200700026.
Engelhardt, Heinz. 2014. 100 Years of Chromatography. Wiley-VCH.
Vivó-Truyols, Gabriel, and Hans-Gerd Janssen. 2010. "Probabilistic approach to peak deconvolution in chromatography." Analytical Chemistry 82: 8525-8531. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac101742z.
Van Deemter, J. J., F. J. Zuiderweg, and A. Klinkenberg. 1956. "Longitudinal diffusion and resistance to mass transfer as causes of nonideality in chromatography." https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(56)80003-1.
Giddings, J. Calvin. 1965. "Dynamics of Chromatography, Part I: Principles and Theory." Marcel Dekker.
Wu, Naijun, and Anton M. Clausen. 2007. "Fundamental and practical aspects of ultrahigh pressure liquid chromatography for fast separations." https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.200700026.
Snyder, L. R., J. J. Kirkland, and J. L. Glajch. 1997. "Practical HPLC Method Development." Wiley.
Vivó-Truyols, Gabriel, and Hans-Gerd Janssen. 2010. "Probabilistic approach to peak deconvolution in chromatography." https://doi.org/10.1021/ac101742z.
Sadek, Paul C.. 2002. "The HPLC Solvent Guide." Wiley-Interscience.
Foley, Joe P., and John G. Dorsey. 1983. "Equations for calculation of chromatographic figures of merit for ideal and skewed peaks." https://doi.org/10.1021/ac00255a033.
Snyder, Lloyd R., Joseph J. Kirkland, and John W. Dolan. 2010. "Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography." Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470508183.
United States Pharmacopeial Convention. 2024. "USP <621> Chromatography." In United States Pharmacopeia and National Formulary, USP 47-NF 42. Rockville, MD: USP. https://www.uspnf.com/.
International Organization for Standardization. 2017. "ISO/IEC 17025:2017 General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories." Geneva: ISO. https://www.iso.org/standard/66912.html.
Kolthoff, Izaak Maurits, and Philip J. Elving, eds. 1978. Treatise on Analytical Chemistry, Part I: Theory and Practice. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
Skoog, Douglas A., F. James Holler, and Stanley R. Crouch. 2018. Principles of Instrumental Analysis. 7th ed. Boston: Cengage Learning.
Christian, Gary D., Purnendu K. Dasgupta, and Kevin A. Schug. 2014. Analytical Chemistry. 7th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Snyder, Lloyd R., Joseph J. Kirkland, and John W. Dolan. 2010. "Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography." John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470508183.
U.S. FDA. 2026. "FDA Guidance and Resources: CAS 56-69-9." Silver Spring, MD: U.S. Food and Drug Administration. https://www.fda.gov/media/74954/download. (Accessed 2026-08-01.)
International Organization for Standardization. 1994. "ISO 5725-2:1994 Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of Measurement Methods and Results — Part 2: Basic Method for the Determination of Repeatability and Reproducibility of a Standard Measurement Method." Geneva: ISO. https://www.iso.org/standard/11834.html.
Grubbs, Frank E. 1950. "Sample Criteria for Testing Outlying Observations." Annals of Mathematical Statistics 21 (1): 27–58.
Dixon, Wilfrid J. 1950. "Analysis of Extreme Values." Annals of Mathematical Statistics 21 (4): 488–506.
Snedecor, George W., and William G. Cochran. 1989. Statistical Methods. 8th ed. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
Student [William Sealy Gosset]. 1908. "The Probable Error of a Mean." Biometrika 6 (1): 1–25.
International Organization for Standardization. 2005. "ISO 3534-1:2006 Statistics — Vocabulary and Symbols — Part 1: General Statistical Terms and Terms Used in Probability." Geneva: ISO. https://www.iso.org/standard/40145.html.
Thompson, Michael, Stephen L. R. Ellison, and Roger Wood. 2002. "Harmonized Guidelines for Single-Laboratory Validation of Methods of Analysis." Pure and Applied Chemistry 74 (5): 835–855.
Ministerstwo Klimatu i Srodowiska. 2026. "Baza Danych o Odpadach (BDO): CAS 56-69-9." Warszawa: Ministerstwo Klimatu i Srodowiska. https://bdo.mos.gov.pl/. (Accessed 2026-08-01.)
Pohanish, Richard P.. 2017. "Sittig's Handbook of Toxic and Hazardous Chemicals and Carcinogens." Elsevier.
Lewis, Richard J.. 2012. "Sax's Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials." Wiley.
NIOSH. 2024. "Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards." U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npg/.
U.S. OSHA. 2026. "Occupational Safety and Health Guidance: CAS 56-69-9." Washington, DC: U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. https://www.osha.gov/chemicaldata. (Accessed 2026-08-01.)
IPCS INCHEM. 2024. "International Programme on Chemical Safety — Waste Management Guidelines." WHO/UNEP/ILO. https://www.inchem.org/.
International Organization for Standardization. 2017. "ISO/IEC 17025:2017 General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories." ISO. https://www.iso.org/standard/66912.html.
World Health Organization. 2010. "WHO Good Manufacturing Practices for Pharmaceutical Products: Main Principles (WHO Technical Report Series No. 957, Annex 3)." WHO Press. https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/trs957-annex3.
Pharmaceutical Inspection Co-operation Scheme (PIC/S). 2021. "Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products PE 009-15." PIC/S Secretariat, Geneva. https://picscheme.org/en/publications.
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.